<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks. Obviously Republicans Were the Only Victims.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html</link>
	<description>cutting through the fat of this world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:39:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nasavo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks.</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-26762</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasavo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-26762</guid>
		<description>[...] This should make for an entertaining segment on The Daily Show this week. I love when this douchebags try to make fun of people that are head and shoulders above them intellectually. I think Geraldo did something similar last year and he got owned on the show directly afterwards. And we all saw what happened to the bow-tied idiot Tucker Carlson.read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This should make for an entertaining segment on The Daily Show this week. I love when this douchebags try to make fun of people that are head and shoulders above them intellectually. I think Geraldo did something similar last year and he got owned on the show directly afterwards. And we all saw what happened to the bow-tied idiot Tucker Carlson.read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks. &#171; Political Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-17832</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks. &#171; Political Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-17832</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklier Edited</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-14647</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklier Edited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-14647</guid>
		<description>before anyone jumps on me, &quot;That, and you&#039;re...&quot; in the last full paragraph should actually be &quot;That, and your...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>before anyone jumps on me, &#8220;That, and you&#8217;re&#8230;&#8221; in the last full paragraph should actually be &#8220;That, and your&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklier Edited</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-14639</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklier Edited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-14639</guid>
		<description>Frankly Edited, your criticism is spotty and hard to follow. Your grammar borders on unreadable. If you break down the sentence structures, you&#039;re saying things like &quot;You... has merely degraded yourself.&quot; You constantly use sentence fragments, starting in the middle but leaving out the beginning. Spaces are to be used after periods so that it is clear you are starting a new sentence (albeit just a fragment of one). There should be a comma after &quot;verifiable&quot;, separating it from &quot;son&quot; as you are addressing somebody. The use of archaic words such as &quot;opine&quot; does not excuse these other mistakes. 

Also, nowhere in the definition of the word &quot;prophetic&quot; does it say that you must verbally express a prediction. In fact, you can even write or simply think prophetically. Not to mention the fact that you incorrectly quote the original poster (he said &quot;prophetic,&quot; not &quot;nearly prophetic&quot;). 

Of course, with the age of the internet upon us, anybody can leave poorly written criticisms on the &quot;spindles of the ol&#039; interweb,&quot; but if you&#039;re going to live by the critical and editorial sword, you should be prepared to die by it as well. 

To state my point more bluntly, give your own posts a proofread before you use them to criticize the way others write. That, and you&#039;re entire argument against the poster is based solely on his use of the word &quot;prophetic,&quot; which somehow links him to the likes of John Gibson (who I must assume has made similar claims to prophecy and fortune-telling?).

Take your own advice and think before you hit &quot;submit.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly Edited, your criticism is spotty and hard to follow. Your grammar borders on unreadable. If you break down the sentence structures, you&#8217;re saying things like &#8220;You&#8230; has merely degraded yourself.&#8221; You constantly use sentence fragments, starting in the middle but leaving out the beginning. Spaces are to be used after periods so that it is clear you are starting a new sentence (albeit just a fragment of one). There should be a comma after &#8220;verifiable&#8221;, separating it from &#8220;son&#8221; as you are addressing somebody. The use of archaic words such as &#8220;opine&#8221; does not excuse these other mistakes. </p>
<p>Also, nowhere in the definition of the word &#8220;prophetic&#8221; does it say that you must verbally express a prediction. In fact, you can even write or simply think prophetically. Not to mention the fact that you incorrectly quote the original poster (he said &#8220;prophetic,&#8221; not &#8220;nearly prophetic&#8221;). </p>
<p>Of course, with the age of the internet upon us, anybody can leave poorly written criticisms on the &#8220;spindles of the ol&#8217; interweb,&#8221; but if you&#8217;re going to live by the critical and editorial sword, you should be prepared to die by it as well. </p>
<p>To state my point more bluntly, give your own posts a proofread before you use them to criticize the way others write. That, and you&#8217;re entire argument against the poster is based solely on his use of the word &#8220;prophetic,&#8221; which somehow links him to the likes of John Gibson (who I must assume has made similar claims to prophecy and fortune-telling?).</p>
<p>Take your own advice and think before you hit &#8220;submit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13576</guid>
		<description>Ha, Jon called Gibson &quot;some idiot at Fox&quot; on last night&#039;s show.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/08/16/jon-stewart-grills-cheney-biographer-stephen-hayes-calls-out-john-gibson-too/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;via Crooks and Liars&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, Jon called Gibson &#8220;some idiot at Fox&#8221; on last night&#8217;s show.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/08/16/jon-stewart-grills-cheney-biographer-stephen-hayes-calls-out-john-gibson-too/" rel="nofollow">via Crooks and Liars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankly Edited</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankly Edited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13525</guid>
		<description>And with the advent of computers and internet and blogs, any person in the world can leave their heartless, weak, and unsupported diatribe on the spindles of the ol&#039; interweb.

&quot;nearly prophetic&quot;???

It&#039;s prophetic is you say it&#039;s going to happen, then it does....Operative word - say. Needs to be verifiable son. You in your ill fated attempt to create a name for yourself, or opine has merely degraded yourself to the same level of those you are frustrated with. Congrats for thinking before hitting &quot;submit&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And with the advent of computers and internet and blogs, any person in the world can leave their heartless, weak, and unsupported diatribe on the spindles of the ol&#8217; interweb.</p>
<p>&#8220;nearly prophetic&#8221;???</p>
<p>It&#8217;s prophetic is you say it&#8217;s going to happen, then it does&#8230;.Operative word &#8211; say. Needs to be verifiable son. You in your ill fated attempt to create a name for yourself, or opine has merely degraded yourself to the same level of those you are frustrated with. Congrats for thinking before hitting &#8220;submit&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woolford</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13488</link>
		<dc:creator>woolford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 04:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13488</guid>
		<description>Obviously, Jon Stewart has to mock John Gibson mocking Jon Stewart now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, Jon Stewart has to mock John Gibson mocking Jon Stewart now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13487</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13487</guid>
		<description>horseshit man, pure horseshit.

the world is a different place now, get with the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>horseshit man, pure horseshit.</p>
<p>the world is a different place now, get with the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13483</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13483</guid>
		<description>For a list of how the Bush administration linked Iraq to 9/11, go to http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&amp;address=358x1293</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a list of how the Bush administration linked Iraq to 9/11, go to <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&amp;address=358x1293" rel="nofollow">http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&amp;address=358&#215;1293</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larz</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13475</link>
		<dc:creator>Larz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13475</guid>
		<description>No one ever claimed we were attacked by Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one ever claimed we were attacked by Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shocked</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13469</link>
		<dc:creator>Shocked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13469</guid>
		<description>John Gibson is openly stating that he supports another catastrophic terrorist attack. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong but if you want 1,000s of Americans dead either to revitalize fear mongering or accomplish a jihad-ist victory doesn&#039;t that make you a traitor/enemy to Americans. Whose the patriot Jon Stewart who makes fun and belittles divisiveness that riddles our country, or John Gibson and other Neo-cons that believe America needs to live constant fear with successful and massive terrorist attacks happening on American territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Gibson is openly stating that he supports another catastrophic terrorist attack. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but if you want 1,000s of Americans dead either to revitalize fear mongering or accomplish a jihad-ist victory doesn&#8217;t that make you a traitor/enemy to Americans. Whose the patriot Jon Stewart who makes fun and belittles divisiveness that riddles our country, or John Gibson and other Neo-cons that believe America needs to live constant fear with successful and massive terrorist attacks happening on American territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13464</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13464</guid>
		<description>What a fool, at least he&#039;s toothless enough to wait a few years to mock him. this callous, meaningless jab is just further evidence that all you seem to need to succeed in fox news punditry these days is a flexible interpretation of good taste, and an inexhaustible abundance of hubris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fool, at least he&#8217;s toothless enough to wait a few years to mock him. this callous, meaningless jab is just further evidence that all you seem to need to succeed in fox news punditry these days is a flexible interpretation of good taste, and an inexhaustible abundance of hubris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/comment-page-1#comment-13460</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13460</guid>
		<description>When we Americans stop handing over the power of our country over to imbeciles like Gibson and those who follow the same ideology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we Americans stop handing over the power of our country over to imbeciles like Gibson and those who follow the same ideology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
