<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks. Obviously Republicans Were the Only Victims.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html</link>
	<description>cutting through the fat of this world</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nasavo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks.</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-26762</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasavo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-26762</guid>
		<description>[...] This should make for an entertaining segment on The Daily Show this week. I love when this douchebags try to make fun of people that are head and shoulders above them intellectually. I think Geraldo did something similar last year and he got owned on the show directly afterwards. And we all saw what happened to the bow-tied idiot Tucker Carlson.read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This should make for an entertaining segment on The Daily Show this week. I love when this douchebags try to make fun of people that are head and shoulders above them intellectually. I think Geraldo did something similar last year and he got owned on the show directly afterwards. And we all saw what happened to the bow-tied idiot Tucker Carlson.read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks. &#171; Political Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-17832</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gibson Mocks Jon Stewart&#8217;s Emotional Reaction to 9/11 Attacks. &#171; Political Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-17832</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklier Edited</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-14647</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklier Edited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-14647</guid>
		<description>before anyone jumps on me, "That, and you're..." in the last full paragraph should actually be "That, and your..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>before anyone jumps on me, &#8220;That, and you&#8217;re&#8230;&#8221; in the last full paragraph should actually be &#8220;That, and your&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklier Edited</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-14639</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklier Edited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-14639</guid>
		<description>Frankly Edited, your criticism is spotty and hard to follow. Your grammar borders on unreadable. If you break down the sentence structures, you're saying things like "You... has merely degraded yourself." You constantly use sentence fragments, starting in the middle but leaving out the beginning. Spaces are to be used after periods so that it is clear you are starting a new sentence (albeit just a fragment of one). There should be a comma after "verifiable", separating it from "son" as you are addressing somebody. The use of archaic words such as "opine" does not excuse these other mistakes. 

Also, nowhere in the definition of the word "prophetic" does it say that you must verbally express a prediction. In fact, you can even write or simply think prophetically. Not to mention the fact that you incorrectly quote the original poster (he said "prophetic," not "nearly prophetic"). 

Of course, with the age of the internet upon us, anybody can leave poorly written criticisms on the "spindles of the ol' interweb," but if you're going to live by the critical and editorial sword, you should be prepared to die by it as well. 

To state my point more bluntly, give your own posts a proofread before you use them to criticize the way others write. That, and you're entire argument against the poster is based solely on his use of the word "prophetic," which somehow links him to the likes of John Gibson (who I must assume has made similar claims to prophecy and fortune-telling?).

Take your own advice and think before you hit "submit."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly Edited, your criticism is spotty and hard to follow. Your grammar borders on unreadable. If you break down the sentence structures, you&#8217;re saying things like &#8220;You&#8230; has merely degraded yourself.&#8221; You constantly use sentence fragments, starting in the middle but leaving out the beginning. Spaces are to be used after periods so that it is clear you are starting a new sentence (albeit just a fragment of one). There should be a comma after &#8220;verifiable&#8221;, separating it from &#8220;son&#8221; as you are addressing somebody. The use of archaic words such as &#8220;opine&#8221; does not excuse these other mistakes. </p>
<p>Also, nowhere in the definition of the word &#8220;prophetic&#8221; does it say that you must verbally express a prediction. In fact, you can even write or simply think prophetically. Not to mention the fact that you incorrectly quote the original poster (he said &#8220;prophetic,&#8221; not &#8220;nearly prophetic&#8221;). </p>
<p>Of course, with the age of the internet upon us, anybody can leave poorly written criticisms on the &#8220;spindles of the ol&#8217; interweb,&#8221; but if you&#8217;re going to live by the critical and editorial sword, you should be prepared to die by it as well. </p>
<p>To state my point more bluntly, give your own posts a proofread before you use them to criticize the way others write. That, and you&#8217;re entire argument against the poster is based solely on his use of the word &#8220;prophetic,&#8221; which somehow links him to the likes of John Gibson (who I must assume has made similar claims to prophecy and fortune-telling?).</p>
<p>Take your own advice and think before you hit &#8220;submit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13576</guid>
		<description>Ha, Jon called Gibson "some idiot at Fox" on last night's show.

&lt;a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/08/16/jon-stewart-grills-cheney-biographer-stephen-hayes-calls-out-john-gibson-too/" rel="nofollow"&gt;via Crooks and Liars&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, Jon called Gibson &#8220;some idiot at Fox&#8221; on last night&#8217;s show.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/08/16/jon-stewart-grills-cheney-biographer-stephen-hayes-calls-out-john-gibson-too/" rel="nofollow">via Crooks and Liars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankly Edited</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankly Edited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13525</guid>
		<description>And with the advent of computers and internet and blogs, any person in the world can leave their heartless, weak, and unsupported diatribe on the spindles of the ol' interweb.

"nearly prophetic"???

It's prophetic is you say it's going to happen, then it does....Operative word - say. Needs to be verifiable son. You in your ill fated attempt to create a name for yourself, or opine has merely degraded yourself to the same level of those you are frustrated with. Congrats for thinking before hitting "submit"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And with the advent of computers and internet and blogs, any person in the world can leave their heartless, weak, and unsupported diatribe on the spindles of the ol&#8217; interweb.</p>
<p>&#8220;nearly prophetic&#8221;???</p>
<p>It&#8217;s prophetic is you say it&#8217;s going to happen, then it does&#8230;.Operative word - say. Needs to be verifiable son. You in your ill fated attempt to create a name for yourself, or opine has merely degraded yourself to the same level of those you are frustrated with. Congrats for thinking before hitting &#8220;submit&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woolford</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13488</link>
		<dc:creator>woolford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 04:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13488</guid>
		<description>Obviously, Jon Stewart has to mock John Gibson mocking Jon Stewart now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, Jon Stewart has to mock John Gibson mocking Jon Stewart now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13487</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 03:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13487</guid>
		<description>horseshit man, pure horseshit.

the world is a different place now, get with the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>horseshit man, pure horseshit.</p>
<p>the world is a different place now, get with the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13483</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13483</guid>
		<description>For a list of how the Bush administration linked Iraq to 9/11, go to http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&#38;address=358x1293</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a list of how the Bush administration linked Iraq to 9/11, go to <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&amp;address=358x1293" rel="nofollow">http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&amp;address=358&#215;1293</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larz</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13475</link>
		<dc:creator>Larz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13475</guid>
		<description>No one ever claimed we were attacked by Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one ever claimed we were attacked by Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shocked</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13469</link>
		<dc:creator>Shocked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13469</guid>
		<description>John Gibson is openly stating that he supports another catastrophic terrorist attack. Correct me if I'm wrong but if you want 1,000s of Americans dead either to revitalize fear mongering or accomplish a jihad-ist victory doesn't that make you a traitor/enemy to Americans. Whose the patriot Jon Stewart who makes fun and belittles divisiveness that riddles our country, or John Gibson and other Neo-cons that believe America needs to live constant fear with successful and massive terrorist attacks happening on American territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Gibson is openly stating that he supports another catastrophic terrorist attack. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but if you want 1,000s of Americans dead either to revitalize fear mongering or accomplish a jihad-ist victory doesn&#8217;t that make you a traitor/enemy to Americans. Whose the patriot Jon Stewart who makes fun and belittles divisiveness that riddles our country, or John Gibson and other Neo-cons that believe America needs to live constant fear with successful and massive terrorist attacks happening on American territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13464</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13464</guid>
		<description>What a fool, at least he's toothless enough to wait a few years to mock him. this callous, meaningless jab is just further evidence that all you seem to need to succeed in fox news punditry these days is a flexible interpretation of good taste, and an inexhaustible abundance of hubris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fool, at least he&#8217;s toothless enough to wait a few years to mock him. this callous, meaningless jab is just further evidence that all you seem to need to succeed in fox news punditry these days is a flexible interpretation of good taste, and an inexhaustible abundance of hubris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13460</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harikari.com/politics/john-gibson-mocks-jon-stewarts-emotional-reaction-to-911-attacks-obviously-republicans-were-the-only-victims.html#comment-13460</guid>
		<description>When we Americans stop handing over the power of our country over to imbeciles like Gibson and those who follow the same ideology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we Americans stop handing over the power of our country over to imbeciles like Gibson and those who follow the same ideology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
