Those of you like me, who have not yet donated to a charitable relief organizaton that will help care for the victims of Hurricane Katrina, have probably asked yourself several times why you haven’t given any money yet. When you think about the disaster, you know that the people of New Orleans need your help, but you don’t act because you think in some way you would be giving in to the current social political system that you cannot stand. I hadn’t tried to work through these thoughts until today when I read Ted Rall’s column. He has put into words the troubling thoughts that I’ve been too lazy to sort through and write about.
Government has been shirking its basic responsibilities since the ’80s, when Ronald Reagan sold us his belief that the sick, poor and unlucky should no longer count on “big government” to help them, but should rather live and die at the whim of contributors to private charities. The Katrina disaster, whose total damage estimate has risen from $100 to $125 billion, marks the culmination of Reagan’s privatization of despair.
(snip)
It’s ridiculous, but people evidently need to be reminded that the United States is not only the world’s wealthiest nation but the wealthiest society that has existed anywhere, ever. The U.S. government can easily pick up the tab for people inconvenienced by bad weather–if helping them is a priority. That goes double for Katrina, a disaster caused by the government’s conscious decision to eliminate the $50 million pittance needed to improve New Orleans’ levees.
(snip)
Granted, in terms of popularity of likelihood of success, trying to make a case against giving money to charities compares to lobbying against puppies. The impulse to donate, after all, is rooted in our best human traits. As we watched New Orleanians die of thirst, disease and anarchic violence in the face of Bush Administration disinterest and local government incompetence, millions of us did the only thing we thought we could to do to help: cut a check or click a PayPal button. Tragically, that generosity feeds into the mindset of the sinister ideologues who argue that government shouldn’t help people–the very mindset that caused the levee break that turned Katrina into a holocaust and led to official unresponsiveness. And it is already setting the stage for the next avoidable disaster.
It’s time to “starve the beast”: private charities used by the government to justify the abdication of its duties to its citizens.
Governments should help people. Helping people is one of the main reasons that governments exist. The citizens of New Orleans paid taxes, and government failed them. Now everyone is passing the cup to help them out. I still might decide to donate some money, but I won’t feel all that great about it.
Truth is I feel better about giving money to organizations who fight against Bush’s destructive policies and to politicians running against Republican foot soldiers for Bush.