Browsed by
Tag: Dogs

The Super Rich Protect their Property with Very Expensive Guard Dogs

The Super Rich Protect their Property with Very Expensive Guard Dogs

Over the past decade the super rich saw dramatic increases in their incomes and substantial cuts in their income tax rates. So what’s a super rich person supposed to do with all he’s horded? Protect it with a very expensive specially trained guard dog. The Seattle Times reports:

dog-2-articleInline

When she costs $230,000, as Julia did, the preferred title is “executive protection dog.” This 3-year-old German shepherd, who commutes by private jet between a Minnesota estate and a home in Arizona, belongs to a canine caste that combines exalted pedigree, child-friendly cuddliness and arm-lacerating ferocity.

Julia and her ilk have some of the same tracking and fighting skills as the dogs used in elite military units like Navy SEAL Team 6, which took a dog on its successful raid of Osama bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan in May.

In fact, Julia was sold by a trainer, Harrison Prather, who used to supply dogs to SEAL Team 6 and the British special forces. But then Prather switched to a more lucrative market.

“Either rich people discovered me, or I discovered them — I can’t remember which happened first,” said Prather, the president of Harrison K-9 Security Services in Aiken, S.C.

“She’s a top deal,” Julia’s owner, John Johnson, said as she escorted him around the grounds of his 15-acre estate outside Minneapolis. “She’s won awards. She looks at you, she’s got the most beautiful face.”

“I’ve turned down offers of more than $200,000 for one of my champion dogs,” said Curry, who added he knew of a dog that had sold for more than $400,000 because of its bloodline and breeding potential. (Although Julia’s offspring most likely would have commanded top prices, Johnson said he had no time to breed her and instead had her spayed shortly after buying her in January.)

To clients who can afford the $50,000 price for a typical well-credentialed dog, there are lots of ways to rationalize the price.

“When you compare the costs of a full-time bodyguard versus a dog, the dog makes a lot of sense,” Curry said. “And the dog, unlike the bodyguard, can’t be bought off.”

The article mentions that Mr. Johnson got his first guard dog after receiving threats while running a debt-collection agency in Minnesota called Northland Group.  After reading just a few of the complaints against that company, I can understand why he was threatened. 

He must be doing very well in the debt-collection business if he can afford to pay $230,000 for a dog to protect him from people that think he’s an asshole.

The New IED: Improvised Exploding Dogs

The New IED: Improvised Exploding Dogs

Ronen Bergman wrote a column for the New York Times yesterday about the decline in suicide bombers (they’re running out of volunteers) and how  terrorists may soon train dogs to carry bombs that will be detonated by remote control.

Seven years after 9/11, it may well be that we are witnessing the beginning of the end of suicide terrorism and a shift toward advanced technologies that will enable jihadist bombers to carry out attacks and live to fight another day.

Avoiding suicide has become the major topic on Al Qaeda’s two main Web platforms for discussing the technological aspects of jihad, the forums Ekhlaas and Firdaws. “Those overpowering Satan’s seduction are few, and we sacrifice those few since they may win us Paradise,” read a posting on both sites this summer on the subject of “vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices.” It continued: “Yet, keeping them alive is beneficial for us, since every one of them is tantamount to an entire people. So we must find a way to save those lives and harness that zeal.”

…in a document posted last month at Maarek, the most sophisticated jihadist forum for discussing explosives manufacturing, a prolific technical expert calling himself Abu Abdullah al-Qurashi suggested training dogs to recognize American troops’ uniforms, then releasing other dogs carrying improvised explosive devices toward American soldiers so the bombs can be detonated from a safe distance. The author begins with the following words: “I.E.D. operations, but this time, with dogs. Yes, dogs! Brothers, some may find my words fantastic. But, believe me, we should better let a dog die, than let a Lion of Islam die!”

Another hurdle Western forces may face is that a new emphasis on remote execution would significantly change the profiles of the terrorists. The uneducated, enthusiastic youths from weak economic backgrounds who have formed the bulk of Al Qaeda’s followers — and whom our intelligence services have spent a decade identifying and neutralizing — will give way to a new type of activists: electricians and robotics experts will join the qualified chemists who make the explosives in order to carry out non-suicide attacks.

I expect we’ll soon be hearing about a sudden decline in the dog population in Iraq and Afghanistan.